![]() ![]() I’m suspecting this is the culprit and the process has a sound signature… they have complicated the signal processing do you have any idea why they are moving everything up to 64 bit? Is this a possible cause of sound degradation? I’ll post a screenshot later today… they display what they do and I’ve asked them about it and they said the 64 but thing is for “transparency. Is it becoz in studio we have the option to choose kernel streaming and ROON does not have this as i see it. They are doing this funky thing where everything is moved into a 64 bit container and then dropped back down to 16/24 before output…. i have both ROON and this Audirvana Studio(Trial Version) and the sound coming out from the studio is so good it’s almost holographic and so neutral and the tempo is quick too, compare to ROON w/c is really flat by the way. And sometimes the main argument in this case. I was a member of the Roon community for nearly a decade and politely shared this experience. As for Audirvan, this player application is not much worse than Roon, some audiophiles consider it to be the best. Still, Roon is nice to use and listen to, but when you put thousands of USD into equipment, you do not want the streaming to take from that. It does the same thing on all devices and tracks wirelessly so it likely has nothing to do with computer noise! … boosts the bass response (bad bass texture and lacking all character) while making vocals difficult to hear. With Roon, around 10 to 20 of the sound is masked when compared to Audirvana. ![]() The Audirvana Studio signature is the same and tracks between all my devices PS Strata via WiFi -UPnP, and my Bluetooth speakers (Klipsch the 3) and even Sony wireless earbuds. Listen to music in Hi-Res on phones, tablets, computers or on your Hi-Fi system. Would you believe the signature of these packages is consistent with wireless transmission?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |